Penerapan Strategi Umpan Balik Reflektif dalam Penulisan Simpulan dan Saran Laporan PTK dalam Perspektif Kajian Sistematik

Putri Salsabilah, Imron Fauzi, Nanik Syafiratul Jannah, Asiatul Hafsoh, Dinda Dia Ulkarimah

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran umpan balik reflektif dalam meningkatkan kualitas penulisan simpulan dan saran pada laporan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) melalui pendekatan systematic literature review. Kajian ini menggunakan metode PRISMA dalam proses seleksi literatur yang melibatkan database Google Scholar, Scopus, dan jurnal terindeks SINTA. Sebanyak 120 artikel teridentifikasi pada tahap awal, kemudian disaring menjadi 60 artikel berdasarkan relevansi dan tahun publikasi (2017–2026). Setelah tahap evaluasi kelayakan, diperoleh 30 artikel, dan akhirnya 25 artikel dipilih sebagai sumber utama analisis. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan reflective feedback secara signifikan berkontribusi terhadap peningkatan kualitas penulisan akademik, khususnya dalam merumuskan simpulan dan saran yang sistematis, reflektif, dan berbasis data. Selain itu, integrasi peer feedback, teacher feedback, dan penggunaan teknologi pembelajaran terbukti mampu meningkatkan feedback literacy mahasiswa. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoritis dalam pengembangan kajian feedback literacy serta implikasi praktis bagi pendidik dalam merancang strategi pembelajaran yang mendukung kemampuan reflektif dalam penulisan laporan PTK.


Keywords


Umpan Balik; Reflektif; Penulisan Simpulan; Saran; Laporan PTK.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Dawson, P., & Boud, D. (2021). Conceptualising evaluative judgement for sustainable assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8), 1134–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1887811

Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2019). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Theory Into Practice, 61(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992

Brown, G. T. L. (2022). Student conceptions of assessment: Regulatory responses to our practices. ECNU Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311211007869

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877

Evans, C. (2020). Enhancing assessment feedback practice in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education.

Gao, Y., An, Q., & Schunn, C. D. (2023). The bilateral benefits of providing and receiving peer feedback in academic writing across varying L2 proficiency. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 77, 101252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101252

Henderson, M., Ryan, T., & Phillips, M. (2019). The challenges of feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1237–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2018). “We believe that…”: Changes in an academic stance marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498

Jin, F. J., et al. (2024). Scaffolding feedback literacy: Designing a feedback analytics tool with students. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(2), 123–137.

Lee, I. (2017). Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12215

Lipnevich, A. A., Panadero, E., & Tomas, C. (2021). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. Frontiers in Education, 6, 720195. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.720195

Little, T., et al. (2024). Can students’ feedback literacy be improved? A scoping review of interventions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2177613

Malecka, B., et al. (2022). Navigating feedback practices across learning contexts: Implications for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1330–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2041544

Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955

Nicol, D. (2021). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 756–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314

Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2019). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1520193

Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2022). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y

Pitt, E., & Winstone, N. (2023). Enabling and valuing feedback literacies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2107168

Schluer, J., & Brück-Hübner, A. (2025). Diversity of pedagogical feedback designs: Results from a scoping review of feedback research in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(2), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2378336

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Studies in Educational Evaluation. (2026). A systematic review of feedback literacy scales: Development and validation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 88, 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101578

Sudirman, A. (2024). Reinforcing reflective practice through reflective writing in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(5), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.5.24

Tai, J., et al. (2023). Assessment for inclusion: Rethinking contemporary strategies in assessment design. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057451

Van der Loo, J., Krahmer, E., & Van Amelsvoort, M. (2019). Reflection in learning to write an academic text: How does reflection affect observational learning and learning-by-doing in a research synthesis task? Frontiers in Education, 4, 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00019

Wisniewski, B., et al. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087

Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education. Routledge.

Yan, Z., & Carless, D. (2022). Feedback literacy and student engagement. Springer.

Zhang, S., Xu, J., Chen, H., Jiang, L., & Yi, X. (2024). Influence of teacher autonomy support in feedback on high school students’ feedback literacy: The multiple mediating effects of basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1411082. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411082

Zhao, H. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and peer feedback in academic writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v18n5p14

Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1376310




DOI: https://doi.org/10.56842/pendikdas.v7i1.1063

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.