From Solar Cells to Sustainable Futures: Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Experimentation and Generative AI for STEM-ESD Literacy

Arip Nurahman, Ida Kaniawati, Eka Chaya Prima, Endi Suhendi

Abstract


This study examined how an instructional program integrating hands-on dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) experimentation with critically guided generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) inquiry influences university students' STEM–Education for Sustainable Development (STEM–ESD) literacy. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design with an embedded quasi-experimental component was employed. Participants were 64 undergraduate physics education students in Bandung, Indonesia, allocated by intact class sections into an intervention group (n = 32) and a comparison group (n = 32). Across six weekly sessions the intervention group framed an energy problem, fabricated and characterized DSSCs sensitized with natural dyes, interrogated GenAI-generated explanations against their own measurements, and redesigned their cells using sustainability criteria. Data were collected through a validated five-dimension STEM–ESD literacy test administered before and after the program, laboratory notebooks, reflective journals, GenAI interaction logs, group discussions, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using baseline-adjusted regression models and effect-size estimation, qualitative data through thematic and epistemic coding with an epistemic-network representation, and the two strands were integrated using joint displays. Illustrative findings indicate the largest gains in sustainability literacy and evidence-evaluation practices, explained by an iterative cycle in which AI-generated explanations were treated as claims requiring verification rather than as authoritative answers.


Keywords


Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell; Generative Artificial Intelligence; Scientific Inquiry; STEM–ESD Literacy; Sustainability Education.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akiri, E., Tal, M., Peretz, R., Dori, D., & Dori, Y. J. (2020). STEM graduate students' systems thinking, modeling and scientific understanding The case of food production. Applied Sciences, 10(21), 7417. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217417

Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students' higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216

Aydin-Günbatar, S., Durukan, A., & Günbatar, M. S. (2026). Generative AI as the new frontier in science education: A systematic review of Web of Science articles. Science & Education, 35(3), 823–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00677-6

Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257

Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette-Remington, S., Dripps, W., Habron, G., Harré, N., Jarchow, M., Losch, K., Michel, J., Mochizuki, Y., Rieckmann, M., Parnell, R., Walker, P., & Zint, M. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education Toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustainability Science, 16(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.

Chang, J., Park, J., & Sim, J. Y. (2026). Harnessing generative AI to facilitate epistemic understanding of students in scientific inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 35(4), 1044–1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10298-5

Chien, S.-I., Su, C., Chou, C.-C., & Wang, H.-H. (2021). Research insights and challenges of secondary school energy education: A dye-sensitized solar cells case study. Sustainability, 13(19), 10581. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910581

Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM education, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1

Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-196. https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Li, P.-H., Lee, H.-Y., Lin, C.-J., Wang, W.-S., & Huang, Y.-M. (2025). InquiryGPT: Augmenting ChatGPT for enhancing inquiry-based learning in STEM education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 2157-2186. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241289824

Lindfors, M., Bodin, M., & Simon, S. (2020). Unpacking students' epistemic cognition in a physics problem-solving environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 695-732. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21606

Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Computers & Education, 219, 105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.

Min, T., Lee, B., & Jho, H. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence in the design of scientific inquiry for middle school students. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 15329-15360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13410-1

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024). Empowering student self-regulated learning and science education through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1328-1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13454

Nurahman, A., Prima, E. C., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Hamdani, N. A., Ismail, A., Gumilar, S., Fauziah, I., Sari, L., & Adimayuda, R. (2023). Improving STEM literacy on the topic of organic solar cells through an AI-powered personalized learning platform: A case study of pre-physics teachers. Proceedings Series of Educational Studies, 61-72.

OECD. (2025). PISA 2025 science framework. OECD Publishing.

Prima, E. C., Nugroho, H. S., Nugraha, Refantero, G., Panatarani, C., & Yuliarto, B. (2020). Performance of the dye-sensitized quasi-solid state solar cell with combined anthocyanin-ruthenium photosensitizer. RSC Advances, 10(60), 36873–36886. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA06550A

Redman, A., & Wiek, A. (2021, November). Competencies for advancing transformations towards sustainability. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 785163). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.785163

Rivera-Novoa, A., & Arias, D. A. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence and extended cognition in science learning contexts. Science & Education. Advance online publication.

Senthil, R. (2022). Recent innovations in solar energy education and research towards sustainable energy development. Acta Innovations, (42), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.32933/ActaInnovations.42.3

Septiyanto, A., & Prima, E. C. (2024). STEM education in solar cells: An overview. KnE Social Sciences, 9(13). https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.16073

Sichula, V. A. (2023). Synthesis and characterization of a metal-free organic dye-sensitizer for solar cell: An advanced organic chemistry research-based laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(1), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00261

Tang, K. S., & Putra, G. B. S. (2026). Generative AI as a dialogic partner: Enhancing multiple perspectives, reasoning, and argumentation in science education with customized chatbots. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 35(1), 128-140.

Toma, R. B., García-Carmona, A., & Quílez, J. (2025). Are integrated STEM educational reforms at risk? Teachers' motivations and perceived barriers to integration. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(10), 2238–2254. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70026

UNESCO. (2021). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO.

Wang, M., He, J., Lei, W., Luo, Q., Wu, W., & Zhu, W.-H. (2024). Enhancing undergraduate research experience through synthesis and photovoltaic applications of photochromic organic sensitizers. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 1154-1161. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00846

Watwe, V. S., Kulkarni, S. D., & Kulkarni, P. S. (2025). Building solar cells from scratch: A multiweek, hands-on approach to photovoltaic education through dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 102(10), 4622-4630. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00816

Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6




DOI: https://doi.org/10.56842/jp-ipa.v7i03.921

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.