Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Calon Guru IPA pada Materi Kelistrikan Menggunakan Metode Three-Tier Multiple Choice

Linda Yuni Haryanto, Zahra Awwalun Nikmah, Saskia Nazwa Anggraini, Izzatul Fauziah, Dody Rahayu Setyo

Abstract


This study aims to identify prospective science teachers' misconceptions on electricity using a three-tier multiple-choice test. The research method used is descriptive quantitative with 21 students of the Science Education study program at UIN Sunan Kudus as the subjects. This study was conducted at the Science Education Study Program at UIN Sunan Kudus in the even semester of the 2024/2025 academic year. The subjects consisted of 21 science students at UIN Sunan Kudus. The data collection technique used a Three-Tier Multiple Choice (TTMC) diagnostic test, a three-tier multiple choice instrument used to identify students' understanding and conceptual errors. This test consists of three levels: answers, reasons, and confidence levels in providing answers. The results showed that conceptual understanding and misconceptions were approximately 35% and 30%, respectively. Meanwhile, positive misconceptions and negative misconceptions were approximately 15–18%. This means that approximately 50% of respondents experienced misconceptions on the concepts of series and parallel circuits, electric charge, and electricity sources. Researchers used deeper identification through the second and third tiers to differentiate between misconceptions, positive misconceptions, negative misconceptions, not understanding the concept, not understanding the concept, guessing, and understanding the concept. These findings also confirm that the three-tier multiple-choice method is effective in identifying misconceptions among prospective science teachers.


Keywords


Misconceptions; Three-Tier Multiple Choice; Electricity; Pre-Service Science Teachers; Conceptual Understanding

Full Text:

PDF

References


Busyairi, A., Munandar, R., Apsari, P. A. D., Wahyuni, A., Nurhasanah, N., Arni, K. J., Walihah, Z., & Diarta, M. H. (2022). Identification of Prospective Physics Teacher’s Misconceptions of Temperature and Heat concept Using the Three Tier Test: England. AMPLITUDO : Journal of Science and Technology Inovation, 1(2), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.56566/amplitudo.v1i2.9

Darwis, R., & Hardiansyah, M. R. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi Calon Guru IPA Terpadu pada Materi Pamanasan Global Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(4), 1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i4.732

Didik, L. A., Wahyudi, Muh., & Kafrawi, M. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Tingkat Pemahaman Mahasiswa Tadris Fisika pada Materi Listrik Dinamis Menggunakan 3-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 3(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v3i2.9911

Elvia, R., Rohiat, S., & Ginting, S. M. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Pembelajaran Daring Matematika Kimia Melalui Tes Diagnostik Three Tier Multiple Choice. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 9(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v9i2.4422

Faizah, K. (2016). Miskonsepsi Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. urnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam, VIII(1), 119–120.

Fitrianingrum, A. M., & Astuti, B. (2017). Penerapan Instrumen Three-Tier Test untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA pada Materi Keseimbangan Benda Tegar. 07(2).

Halim, D. V., Sitompul, S. S., & Aminullah, L. M. (2024). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning dengan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi untuk Remediasi Miskonsepsi Materi Listrik Arus Searah di SMA. Unnes Physics Education Journal.

Hera, R. & Rita Oktavia. (2023). Miskonsepsi Materi Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Bionatural, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.61290/bio.v10i2.616

Lestari, E. A., Harjito, H., Susilaningsih, E., & Wijayati, N. (2021a). Analisis Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Tes Diagnosa Three-Tier Multiple Choice pada Materi Stoikiometri. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(2), 2824–2830. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v15i2.29171

Mellyzar, M., Fakhrah, F., & Isnani, I. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA: Menggunakan Instrumen Three Tier Multiple Choice pada Materi Struktur Atom dengan Teknik Certanty of Response Index (CRI). Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 2556–2564. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2438

Saputra, H., Halim, A., & Khaldun, I. (2013). Upaya Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Children Learning in Science (CLIS) Berbasis Simulasi Komputer pada Pokok Bahasan Listrik Dinamis.

Sari, N. I., Sulur, & Pramono, N. A. (2019). Pengembangan M-Learning Physics for Fun Berbasis Android pada Materi Listrik Statis untuk Siswa SMA/MA. JRPF (Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika).

Surya, A. D., Tajqiyah, L., Refiarni, R., Sumarno, S., & Siswanto, J. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Kognitif dan Miskonsepsi Pembelajaran IPA Materi Kalor pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar di STKIP Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Aquinas, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.54367/aquinas.v6i1.2318

Tawil, Muh. (2024). Investigasi Miskonsepsi Kelistrikan Guru IPA di Indonesia. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(4), 3313–3324. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i4.6989

Wahidah S., S. N., Kusairi, S., & Zulaikah, S. (2017). Diagnosis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA di Kota Malang pada Konsep Suhu dan Kalor Menggunakan Three Tier Test. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(3), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i3.295




DOI: https://doi.org/10.56842/jp-ipa.v6i2.562

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.