Scaffolded Reading to Improve Student Reading Performance at SMPN 5 Kodi Utara

Lukas Pati Mone

Abstract


This study aims to describe whether Scaffolded Reading can improve the reading achievement of grade I students of SMP Negeri 5 Kodi Utara for the 2022/2023. The research method applied in this study is classroom action research (CAR) with a collaborative action research design where the subject of this study is grade I students of SMP Negeri 5 Kodi Utara. The author only focuses on the application of Scaffolded Reading to improve student reading achievement. Data is collected through quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were obtained from the reading scores of pretest and posttest students. Then, the techniques used to collect the data are; The test consists of 30 items with 4 options and is categorized as multiple choice. Then qualitative data were obtained from observation sheets and questionnaires. The findings of this study show that there is a progression in students' reading achievement and improvement. It can be seen from the average score of the pretest is 65.95. and the average posttest score was 83.30. In addition, there were 9 students or 45% of the 25 students who passed the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM) in the pretest. Meanwhile, in the first cycle there were 18 students or 90% of the 25 students. Then, from the observation sheet, the results showed that more students responded well to reading independence in teaching reading. Based on the results of percentage data in questionnaires such as Strongly Agree is 18.00%, Agree is 15.60%, Undecided  is 4.35%, Disagree is 1.30%, and Strongly Disagree is 0.55%. The authors conclude that students' reading achievement improved very well in learning to read English

Keywords


Read, snd Scaffolded Reading.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adipati, N. K. (2002). Genre: Sifat Khusus dari membaca Pemahaman. New York: Routledge.

Agita. P. A. (2014). Pelaksanaan Scaffolded Reading pada Mini Story dalam Pengajaran Menulis Teks Naratif. Tidak dipublikasikan. Tesis

Arikunto & Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Billman, AK (2009). Elemen Penting dari Membina dan Mengajar Pemahaman Bacaan. New York: Guilford.

Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4(1), 269-284.

Croft, A., Coggshall, J. G., Dolan, M., & Powers, E. (2010). Job-Embedded Professional Development: What It Is, Who Is Responsible, and How to Get It Done Well. Issue Brief. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.

David J. Richard. (2008). Apa itu Pemahaman Bacaan. Membangun Komunitas Pakar Membaca. Pusat Nasional untuk Membaca Pertama.

Furchan, H. A. (2007). Pengantar Penelitian dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta : Pustaka

Johnson, AP (2008). Mengajar membaca dan menulis. Buku panduan untuk les dan remediasi siswa. Lanham: Pendidikan Rowman & Littelefield.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research.

Pollard, R. (2008). Home advantage in football: A current review of an unsolved puzzle. The open sports sciences journal, 1(1).

Raharjo, A. S. R., & Amung, H. (2001). Media Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.

Sudijono, A. (2008). Statistik pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudirman R. Raharjo. 2001. Media Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.

Suharsimi & Arikunto. (2006). Metodelogi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Bina Aksara.

Sudjana, N. (2004). Basics of teaching and learning process. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensido Offset.

Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & De Bot, K. (2009). Input and second language development from a dynamic perspective. Input matters in SLA, 6281.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.56842/bahtra.v4i01.241

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.